| |
|
|
 |
 |
Below is the Team from United Media Resources who organise MAE and they are Melanie Firth (centre) and Event Director James Ormiston, grateful recipients of the widely coveted award of the authentic Cuban Cigar and not for the first time. We were delighted to welcome Maria Raybould (centre right) from SAE-UK Corporate Member’s TRW Conekt |
|
|
|
|
| |
Colin’s address was one of those delightful and insightful lessons all too occasionally encountered. Beginning with a brief treatment of the difficulties in understanding Open Architectures in vehicles. Continuing with the challenges of maintaining MOD interest in terms of finding funding through proposal writing. Imparted wisdom included Colin’s comments on the transitions within the MOD towards Bidding overtaking the traditional budget allocations and the issues duly presented.
Colin Newell’s review of the current position identifies three areas foremostly; Strategic Requirements, Trends and the move towards All Electric Vehicles:
Strategic issues include unpredictable and complex environments (like Iraq), scalability of campaigns (sometimes concurrent and often co-alition); Cited was the example of the Challenger 2 Tank designed for European Cold War but currently deployed in Middle Eastern Campaigns. Challenger 2 suffered from front armament only as it was intended for frontier confrontations and was therefore considered obsolete 5 years ago along with the obsolescence of the European borders themselves. It was redeployed for Iraq on account of its heavy ordinance, breadth of armaments capability and out and out fire power.
General Trends identified in the Lecture included: Overcoming obsolescence as a key driver for Vehicle Integration projects. The driver for new technology should be a high capability across platforms. Priorities presently include support to new campaigns, through life vehicle campaigns (TLCM covered later), and contingent operations (i.e. maintaining capacity to respond militarily anywhere in the world whilst conducting theatre in the Middle East). Utility, change and restructuring were identified as key processes.
Reportedly, Current Campaigns are supported by an Equipment Program and the management of Urgent Operational Requirements (UORs) which are more prevalent in Vehicle Technology than in any other part of the military. UORs have been applied for directly with successful results through the Treasury of the UK Government. This is an interesting counterpoint to the recently reported differences over funding between the British Army and the British Government.
Through Life Capability Management (TLCM) is challenged by changing threats. The MOD is promoting internally the need for consultation with industry, preferably early on in the production cycle. TLCM is compounded by increasingly complex systems which also increases the width of the skills base required.
TLCM opens up quicker routes to deployment but that still requires training for vehicle operation and maintenance; training, equipment, personnel, information, concepts, logistics must all be considered before deployment. This leads to problems of overburdening and a slower pace of progress.
All Electric Vehicle: There is a £7.5m pound program for a Vehicle Technology Integration Demonstrator which is currently being developed under the spectre of the All Electric Vehicle, the consequences of the advent of this technology cannot be foreseen with clarity. This progress was transposed against the |
|
 |
backdrop of modern requirements of theatre including an increased vehicle weight of 40% on average consisting mainly of survivability equipment placing greater stress on engines and overall performance.
Solving problems under fire creates practical problems of wiring such as the need to make holes in armour, too much cabling, with power drains identified as the greatest of all the considerations. User interfaces called ‘Middleware’ and actual software (where the former represents user-friendliness) can reduce program costs by making interfaces intuitive and thus avoiding excessive training costs. Power solutions can be achieved through additional power generation equipment, voltage systems can be downscaled to reduce cable and connector sizes. Increasing power lights up the vehicle to the enemy with signatures in electromagnetic (EM) spectrum and in particular the Infra-Red or thermal. Components off the Shelf (COTS) introduce safety aspects and obsolecence issues where MOD ends up buying its entire future stocks at a single stroke once the market for these mass-produced articles moves on to newer wares.
A Review of Michael Morua’s keynote lecture on Systems Architecture on FRES (Future Rapid Effect System)
Reportedly, an important feature of Open Architecture should be that future capability is not excluded by the original manufacturing solution. Concentrating on FRES (3721 number of vehicles) which is a program to design a family vehicles to meet future medium weight armoured vehicle capability, utility 2012, recce 1163, medium armour 210 (mini tanks), manoeuvre support (build bridges) 77 basic capability utility 2509. The fielding plan includes provisions for vehicles in the mechanised infantry battalion, battle group, mechanised brigade, and divisional HQ. The presentation highlighted the designed interchangeability of these vehicles between these roles.
FRES TEAM ONE begins with USER (The Army) sponsored by DEC (GM) executed by FRES IPT who works with project expeditors such Atkins and DSTL. All bodies are expected to work together as a team in a FRES Alliance, Designers and Providers (two separate entities) with upgrade plans in place. Currently there are 3 contenders; Piranha, Boxer and French VBCI which will be downslected to one or two. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|